Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:48

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
"Oh, Mary!" star Cole Escola manifested their Tony win the old-fashioned way - Salon.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Probability of Asteroid 2024 YR4 hitting the Moon increases - theregister.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Oregon State leaves no doubt, outslug Florida State to reach College World Series - OregonLive.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Who are some of the darkest skinned actors in Hollywood?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Opinion: The secret to a longer life could be this old-fashioned English breakfast - MarketWatch
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Mark Hughes dissects how Verstappen's win bid imploded - The Race
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.